Maria Ramirez, center, protests along with hundreds of other Silverado students in the senior quad at the Victorville, Calif., high school on Wednesday, March 14, 2018. The students were joining a nationwide 17 minute walk out to advocate for better gun control and school safety. (James Quigg/The Daily Press via AP)

A conservative panel of a federal appeals judges ruled against yet another California gun law Wednesday, this time holding that California “cannot straightjacket the First Amendment” by allowing minors to possess firearms, then banning truthful advertisements about those firearms. The ruling comes just days after the same panel ruled against California’s restrictive open-carry law.

Under California law, advertising firearm-related products “in a manner that is designed, intended, or reasonably appears to be attractive to minors” is prohibited. Last year, a lower court judge refused to issue a preliminary injunction against enforcement of the statute while a lawsuit brought by Junior Sports Magazine and Second Amendment advocates proceeded.

The three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit unanimously ruled that there is no evidence that the ban on advertisements would achieve its stated goal of reducing illegal gun use and violence among young people.

U.S. Circuit Judge Kenneth Lee, a Donald Trump appointee, penned the opinion for the panel, which ruled that under the First Amendment, states may only ban truthful and lawful advertising if such a ban survives strict scrutiny — meaning that the ban would have to be narrowly-tailored and necessary to achieve a substantial state interest. The two other judges on the panel, Trump appointee Lawrence VanDyke and George W. Bush appointee N. Randy Smith, found that the law at issue did not come close to meeting the standard.

Over 21 pages, Lee used many colorful analogies to underscore what he described as California’s outright failure to introduce enough supportive evidence to show that the law was tied closely enough to youth safety to warrant intrusion on free speech.

“Simply put, California cannot lean on gossamers of speculation to weave an evidence-free narrative that its law curbing the First Amendment ‘significantly’ decreases unlawful gun use among minors,” Lee wrote. “The First Amendment demands more than good intentions and wishful thinking to warrant the government’s muzzling of speech.”

Lee slammed the state’s lawyers for failing to introduce any supportive evidence that a minor within the state has ever unlawfully bought a gun because of an advertisement.

The panel also flatly rejected California’s argument that “common sense” connects the advertisement ban with safety, and said the state’s reliance on “speculation” and “fact-free inferences” are insufficient to justify governmental infringement on speech.

Lee also accused the Golden State of “spin[ning] a web of speculation — not facts or evidence — to claim that its restriction on speech will significantly curb unlawful firearm use and gun violence among minors.”

Additionally, Lee also noted that the law itself was far too broad. Under its language, for example, a company might be prevented from marketing a camouflage-colored gun for adults because it might appeal to minors, he said.

The judge raised another example of the statute’s overbreadth:

And bizarrely, California’s law would likely ban advertisements promoting safer guns for minors — for example, a hunting rifle designed for young hunters that has less recoil or that comes with a more secure trigger safety — if they are directed at minors and their parents.

You May Also Like

The Death of Dylan Redwine – Crime Online

Dylan Redwine, 13, is forced to spend Thanksgiving with his father in…

John Fields crashed into deputy during DUI search: Cops

A sheriff’s deputy in Virginia searching for an alleged drunk driver found…

Man who stabbed ex after nursing shift 25 times guilty: Jury

A New York man who fatally stabbed his ex-girlfriend more than 25…

Parents Who Sued Coroner to Change Manner of Death Convicted of Murdering 8-Year-Old Son – Crime Online

Two Ohio parents convicted of murdering their 8-year-old son have been sentenced…