Why Did Prince Harry Break Silence After Securing Win In Latest Court Battle Against Daily Mail

Find out “Why Did Prince Harry Break Silence After Securing Win In Latest Court Battle Against Daily Mail? Prince Harry received uplifting news today as a High Court judge granted permission for his legal proceedings against the Daily Mail’s publisher to proceed. Elton John and Baroness Doreen Lawrence also obtained approval for their respective cases.

This trio is part of a prominent group, including David Furnish, Sadie Frost, Liz Hurley, and Sir Simon Hughes, who are collectively taking legal action against Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL).

Why Did Prince Harry Break Silence After Securing Win In Latest Court Battle Against Daily Mail
Why Did Prince Harry Break Silence After Securing Win In Latest Court Battle Against Daily Mail

Their accusations against the publisher involve alleged engagement in or commissioning of unlawful activities, such as employing private investigators to install listening devices inside cars, “blagging” private records, and accessing and recording private phone conversations.

During a hearing in March, ANL refuted the allegations and attempted to have the case dismissed. However, today, Mr. Justice Nicklin stated that the publisher had “not been able to deliver a ‘knockout blow’ to the claims of any of these claimants,” allowing the cases to proceed.

Why Did Prince Harry Break Silence After Securing Win In Latest Court Battle Against Daily Mail

Hours after the judgment was given, the trio released a statement saying they were “delighted” by the news.

In a statement issued by the law firm Hamlins on their behalf, the seven people in the claim said they were “delighted with today’s decision which allows our claims over serious criminal activity and gross breaches of privacy by the Mail titles to proceed to trial”.

The statement continued: “The High Court has dismissed ‘without difficulty’ the attempt by Associated Newspapers, publisher of The Daily Mail, The Mail on Sunday and the Mail Online, to throw these cases out.

“Indeed, the judge found that each of our claims had a real prospect of showing there was concealment of unlawful acts by the Mail titles and that this could not have been discovered until recently. Our claims can now proceed to trial.

“As we have maintained since the outset, we bring our claims over the deplorable and illegal activities which took place over many years, including private investigators being hired to place secret listening devices inside our cars and homes, the tapping of our phone calls, corrupt payments to police for inside information, and the illegal accessing of our medical information from hospitals and financial information from banks.

“We intend to uncover the truth at trial and hold those responsible at Associated Newspapers fully accountable.”

In their own statement following the decision, ANL said they “look forward” to establishing in court that the group had made “lurid” claims including phone-hacking and burglaries for hire.

The publisher also welcomed the judge’s decision that unpublished ledgers given to the Leveson Inquiry into the practices and ethics of the British press could not be used without Governmental permission, calling it a “significant victory”.

Also Read: Who Are Olivia Colman Children Hall And Finn Sinclair? Husband And Family Tree

You May Also Like

Moscow Attack Suspect Captured in Woods by Russian Troops

The deadly attack on the Crocus City Hall concert hall in Moscow,…

Erling Haaland limps out of training with Norway, raising injury concerns ahead of Man City’s clash with Arsenal

Erling Haaland, the Norwegian forward and Manchester City striker, has raised concerns…

Ex-NHS Care Worker, 52, Faces Psychiatric Report After Poisoning Child with Laxatives for Three Years

Tracy Menhinick, a 52-year-old former NHS care worker, was found guilty of…

Barclays Bank Apologizes for Sending Ex-Husband Spending Details

Barclays Bank has issued an apology to Sara Derbyshire, a 49-year-old woman,…