Judge Refuses to Block Elon Musk DOGE from Firing Workers
  • A federal judge refuses to immediately block Elon Musk and DOGE from accessing government data or Firing Workers.DOGE 
  • The decision came in a lawsuit filed by 14 Democratic states challenging DOGE’s authority to access sensitive government data.
  • Chutkan recognized the concerns of the group of states, which include New Mexico and Arizona.

A U.S. judge has turned down a request to temporarily prevent Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) from dismissing federal employees and accessing agency data, marking a victory for President Donald Trump in his push to shrink the government workforce.

U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan acknowledged that there are valid questions regarding Musk’s authority, but stated that there is no evidence of the serious legal harm that would warrant a temporary restraining order.

Judge Refuses to Block Elon Musk DOGE from Firing Workers
Judge Refuses to Block Elon Musk DOGE from Firing Workers | KBTX

Fourteen states led by Democrats had filed a lawsuit challenging Musk’s legal authority, but Judge Chutkan rejected their emergency request to halt his actions.

The states contended that Musk, who the White House has classified as a special government employee, possesses unchecked power and is infringing upon the Constitution’s Appointments Clause.

The attorneys general argued that Musk is exercising authority that the Constitution reserves for those who are elected or confirmed by the Senate.

The Trump administration has argued that any layoffs are being initiated by agency heads and claimed that, despite Musk’s public support for the initiative, he is not directly managing DOGE’s daily operations.

The Justice Department contended that the states have not demonstrated any imminent, irreparable harm that would justify the court’s involvement.

Justice Department lawyers stated in a court filing that the states’ assertion that Musk has the authority to make governmental decisions is “incorrect” and “is based solely on confusing influence with authority.”

Chutkan acknowledged the concerns raised by the group of states, which includes New Mexico and Arizona. In her ruling, she noted, “the court is aware that DOGE’s unpredictable actions have led to significant uncertainty and confusion for Plaintiffs and many of their agencies and residents.”

However, at this stage, it remains uncertain how exactly DOGE’s operations will impact the states, and judges can only issue orders to prevent specific, immediate harms, she concluded.

Also Read: Cardi B and Stefon Diggs Romance Rumors Ignite After Valentine Date

Last Updated on February 19, 2025 by 247 News Around The World

You May Also Like

Is MAFS Australia’s Jacqui Pregnant? Her Response to Clint Baby Rumours

Table of Contents Hide Jacqui Responds to Pregnancy Rumours After Shock EngagementWhat…

What Is Ex-NFL Star Shannon Sharpe Net Worth 2025? More About His Career And Personal Life

Table of Contents Hide What Is Ex-NFL Star Shannon Sharpe’s Net Worth…

JoJo Siwa Shares She No Longer Identifies as Lesbian, Embraces Queer Identity

JoJo Siwa Shares She No Longer Identifies as Lesbian, but as queer.…

“Don’t Let ‘Family’ Be The Reason You’re Drowning In Silence” – Peter Okoye

Peter Okoye, formerly part of the now-disbanded music group P-Square, has taken…